The North Dakota House of Representatives has passed the first personhood amendment in the United States, 57-35. Read more

Press Release

Nevada Judge Rules Personhood Amendment Meets Single Subject Rule, Rewrites Description Using Detractor’s Claims

Carson City, NV – 12/20/11 – A state judge in Nevada has rewritten language for a personhood amendment, handing down a decision on a lawsuit filed by abortion industry giant Planned Parenthood and pro-abortion group the ACLU. This is the second such lawsuit in Nevada, and among nearly a dozen nationwide, in which abortion profiteers Planned Parenthood have attempted to halt citizen-led efforts for pro-life ballot initiatives.

A 2010 Nevada lawsuit was successful in blocking the effort, but in this most recent decision the judge ruled against Planned Parenthood and the ACLU, stating that the amendment did not violate the single subject rule, and allowing the initiative to go forward.

However, the judge’s decision is marred by the rewrite of the language, incorrectly stating: “The initiative will impact some rights Nevada women currently have to utilize some forms of birth control, including the 'pill;' and to access certain fertility treatments such as in vitro fertilization. The initiative will affect embryonic stem cell research, which offers potential for treating diseases such as diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, heart disease, and others.”

In truth, third-party organizations such as the Mississippi Center for Public Policy have established that women will still have access to contraceptives and fertility treatments such as in vitro fertilization. As with all personhood amendments, the only pills and procedures that would be outlawed are those that are used to intentionally kill an innocent person.

“The judge appears to have taken a page from Planned Parenthood’s book of scare tactics,” commented Keith Mason, President of Personhood USA. “Planned Parenthood states that the pill kills when they are trying to block personhood measures, but tells their patients it is contraceptive when they are selling it.”

“Further, the decision says that personhood will block access to in vitro fertilization when, in reality, it will only block the procedures that intentionally kill innocent children such as the discarding of 'unused embryos' and 'selective reduction' abortion of twins, triplets, and multiples, thus making it safer for both moms and babies,” continued Mason. “An IVF study published in October stated that ‘Transferring one embryo into women during in vitro fertilization (IVF) doesn't lower their chances of giving birth but it does mean fewer women give birth to twins, with all the attendant health risks.’”

“Thankfully, it is true that the initiative will end embryonic stem cell research, but the judge was incorrect in stating that the practice holds any promise,” said Mason.  "Rather, embryonic stem cell research has been abandoned by corporations owning the patents. The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) means that embryonic stem cell research is obsolete. Adult stem cell research holds all of the promise and has proven successful in discovering dozens of treatments.”

Organizers have stated their intent to either appeal the decision or resubmit the language entirely.

“Just as we are pleased with the court's understanding and ruling, we are significantly more perplexed and disappointed by the second part of his ruling. Not only did this judge deny our amended description of effect which the court had ordered we submit, this egregious ruling demands that use the very language proposed by Planned Parenthood and the ACLU who sued to block our initiative in the first place,” said Chet Gallagher, Director of the Nevada Pro-life Coalition. “In the great state of Nevada, which historically protects our freedoms and first amendment rights, this is an outrageous infringement of free speech and the right to petition for redress of grievances. This court order significantly compromises the truth of the life-saving personhood amendment we have proposed.”

Personhood Arkansas Files Language for 2012 Personhood Amendment

Little Rock, AR, 12/19/2011 — Personhood Arkansas has submitted amendment language to the state that would guarantee the right to life of every human being, no matter their age. The amendment reads: “No innocent person shall be denied the right to life. With respect to the right to life, the word “person” shall apply to all human beings, including the unborn, at every stage of their development.”

Similar to the renewed personhood effort in Colorado, the new language includes provisions specifying that the amendment would have no “effect on contraceptives or other methods of birth control that do not cause the death of a person” and “in vitro fertilization or other methods of assisted reproduction that do not cause the death of a person.” Planned Parenthood and the Amendment 26 opposition used the issues throughout the recent Mississippi campaign, confusing voters, and claiming both that contraceptive use and the practice of in vitro fertilization would be prohibited.

The Arkansas Personhood Amendment language also clarifies the pro-life position and the true effect of personhood in that mothers will continue to have access to life saving medical treatments. “This Amendment shall have no effect on medical treatment for life threatening physical conditions intended to preserve life,” it reads.

“We witnessed the misinformation tactics used by those who would continue the abortion carnage. Personhood Arkansas has submitted language that is concise and effective in our goals, and it addresses important concerns Arkansas voters may have,” said Personhood Arkansas Director Preston Dunn, Jr. “I am confident that the taking of some 4,532 innocent unborn children’s lives last year is not what the people of Arkansas want for our great state, and when the time comes, Arkansans will take a stand for life.”

Personhood Arkansas must submit the 78,133 signatures by July to reach the 2012 ballot.

“The people of Arkansas are inspired to declare, by love and by law, that every human being is a person and deserving of all of the rights afforded to ‘all men,’ said Keith Mason, President of Personhood USA. “This amendment is an opportunity for Arkansas to make history by affirming the basic dignity and the most fundamental of all rights of all people.”

Perry Joins Bachmann, Gingrich, and Santorum in Signing Personhood Pledge

ARVADA, Colo., Dec. 15th, 2011 - Texas Governor Rick Perry has added his name to the list of GOP Presidential Candidates who have signed a pro-life pledge sponsored by Personhood USA.

Perry is the fourth to sign the pledge, joining Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. An open invitation has been extended to Congressman Ron Paul, Governor Mitt Romney, and Governor Jon Huntsman.

"Rick Perry's signature on the personhood pledge shows he is 'fed up' with the scourge of child killing in America, as are all pro-lifers," commented Steve Deace, a syndicated radio host whose influence in the Iowa Caucuses has been highlighted by numerous national media outlets. "Since he is the only candidate in the race to currently hold executive office, it should be our expectation that he'll now commit this pledge to action by championing efforts to enact Personhood legislation in the sovereign state of Texas. He is uniquely empowered to advance the cause of Personhood as a governor of a large, conservative state. A man of his word will do exactly that after signing a pledge like this."

Recently, the Southern Baptists of Texas Convention passed a resolution for Personhood in which they resolved to "encourage our elected Texas legislators to adopt an amendment that would affirm the personhood of the unborn," a statement directly in agreement with Governor Perry's signed Personhood pledge.

“We’re pleased that more candidates are standing with the Republican Party's position on Personhood. There is a high standard for candidates who claim to be prolife, and that standard is the personhood rights of the preborn child. These candidates are pledging to agree with Ronald Reagan, and with the vast majority of Republicans, without compromising on human life," stated Gualberto Garcia Jones, J.D., legal analyst for Personhood USA. "Personhood is not a new concept. All human beings are people, and all people have a right to live. Candidates who believe in the Sanctity of Life must also believe in the Personhood rights of all children, born or preborn."

Personhood USA is a grassroots Christian organization founded to establish personhood efforts across America to create protection for every child by love and by law. Personhood USA is committed to assisting and supporting Personhood Legislation and Constitutional Amendments and building local pro-life organizations through raising awareness of the personhood of the preborn.

Personhood USA Petitions GOP Candidates to Follow Reagan’s Lead on Personhood; Bachmann, Santorum, Gingrich Sign First-of-its-kind Personhood Pledge

ARVADA, Colo., Dec. 14, 2011 -- Personhood USA has unveiled a detailed and unique pledge declaring a commitment to advance the personhood rights of every human being, born and preborn. Ahead of the nation’s first presidential caucus in Iowa, Personhood USA is asking the Republican candidates to sign the pledge and declaration.

“I ____________ proclaim that every human being is created in the image and likeness of God, and is endowed by our Creator with the unalienable right to life,” it reads.

So far, candidates who have returned the pledge with their signatures include Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

"This pledge is the most basic articulation of the unalienable right to life," said syndicated radio host Steve Deace, whose influence in the Iowa Caucuses has been highlighted by numerous national media outlets. ”Pro-life voters should consider who has a position on the sanctity of life and who has a conviction on the sanctity of life by the way the candidates respond to this pledge. As a pro-life voter, I know that I won't vote for anyone on January 3rd that hasn't signed this pledge."

Candidates who sign the pledge are aligning themselves with President Ronald Reagan who declared “the unalienable personhood of every American, from the moment of conception until natural death” in his January 1988 Personhood Proclamation.

When asked about the pledge, former Presidential candidate and Iowa Caucus winner Mike Huckabee stated: “Believing that every human life, unborn and born, has intrinsic worth and equal value is the underpinning of our nation's moral core. As one who lived through the Jim Crow laws of the South and saw how people of color were treated as ‘less’ I am encouraged that the Personhood movement is reminding us that all people are deserving of the protections afforded us as human beings. We should never ask people to determine if one person is ‘more’ valuable than another because of wealth, appearance, IQ, ancestry, ethnic origin, or physical capacity. Attempts to dismiss the concept of Personhood will eventually be met with common sense and common decency. Until then, we must continue to speak out boldly for the rights of all to enjoy ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’"

Signers also affirm their support for “a human life amendment to the Constitution” and “endorse legislation to make it clear that 14th Amendment protections apply to unborn children.” Both are positions listed in the Republican Party Platform.

“There has been much speculation as to the candidate’s positions this election cycle,” said Personhood USA Legal Analyst Gualberto Garcia Jones, J.D. “This is an opportunity for the candidates to demonstrate their conviction as a President who will uphold the right to life of every person no matter their age or the circumstances of their creation.”

Personhood USA is a grassroots Christian organization founded to establish personhood efforts across America to create protection for every child by love and by law. Personhood USA is committed to assisting and supporting Personhood Legislation and Constitutional Amendments and building local pro-life organizations through raising awareness of the personhood of the preborn.

New Poll Reveals Real Reason Behind Mississippi Personhood Loss

Following the defeat of Personhood Amendment 26, Personhood Mississippi commissioned a post-election poll to determine what factors influenced voters. Surprisingly, the poll determined that only 8% of those who voted “no” did so because they are pro-choice.

The nation has watched the Mississippi election closely, and there has been much speculation as to what may have caused the unanticipated defeat. Proponents were repeatedly quoted as saying that the amendment could not ban in vitro fertilization, contraception, or healthcare for women. Their statements were correlated by the Mississippi Center for Public Policy, along with many other prominent Mississippi attorneys, doctors, and politicians.

Yet, despite these expert statements and testimonies as to the effects of Amendment 26, Planned Parenthood (under the guise of Mississippians for Healthy Families), persisted in lying to Mississippi voters, propagating scare tactics that were proven false numerous times. As of October 31, with well over a week to go before the election, they reported a hefty $1,030,000 poured into Mississippi from out of state Planned Parenthood affiliates alone.

“Planned Parenthood pulled the wool over the eyes of Mississippians, and I believe that voters will be shocked to learn the truth,” commented Les Riley, founder of Personhood Mississippi and sponsor of the initiative. “They must have been desperate to lie about so many things so often. But beyond the lies, it’s terrible to know that they likely used my own tax dollars to lie to the people of my state. Planned Parenthood reports over $350 million in government funding, and it appears they used well over a million of their government dollars to lie to people in Mississippi.”

The new poll reveals that Planned Parenthood’s willful deceit, which also raised doubts in the mind of Governor Haley Barbour, caused the defeat of Amendment 26.

Governor Barbour previously stated that he had concerns about the amendment, all of which were the same issues that Planned Parenthood used to deceive voters. Barbour did vote “yes” on the amendment, yet even after he announced that he had voted “yes” Planned Parenthood persisted in running television ads and telephone calls misleading voters to believe he had voted “no.” As a result, 12% of voters polled said that they were swayed to vote “no” by Haley Barbour.

Among the most shocking, 31% voted “no” because they thought it would ban in vitro fertilization, a direct lie from the Planned Parenthood camp.

28% of voters polled voted "no" because they believed the Planned Parenthood lie that women would be denied treatment for ectopic pregnancy.

“My family and I invested years of work into this amendment, only to have the largest abortion provider in the country invade Mississippi with their anti-family rhetoric,” continued Riley. “Knowing that Mississippi voted ‘no’ because of lies from our opponents makes me more determined than ever to try again, defending the rights of all Mississippians.”

Only 24 people out of 10,000 polled voted “no” because there were no exceptions for rape and incest, indicating that most voters understand that the human being in the womb is a person, no matter the circumstances of their conception.

Colorado Citizens Announce Third Try for Personhood

Denver, CO – 11/21/11 – Inspired by Mississippi’s heroic efforts for Amendment 26, Colorado citizens have rallied behind the third attempt at a Personhood Amendment in Colorado.

Today, Personhood Colorado has filed language for a new personhood amendment with the Colorado Secretary of State’s office, sponsored by Kevin Swanson and Rosalinda Lozano.

Rosalinda Lozano is a Denver resident, native Coloradan, and committed member of the Catholic Church. Along with a history of volunteering for previous personhood amendments and various prolife efforts, Rosalinda is sponsoring the Colorado Personhood amendment at the same time that she is working to open Lighthouse, a Medical Center dedicated to helping women and presenting alternatives to women in crisis pregnancies. Lighthouse is set to open in early 2012 near Planned Parenthood in Denver, which is the second-largest abortion facility in the nation.

Sponsor Kevin Swanson hosts the daily radio program, “Generations Radio”, which is the world’s largest homeschooling and Biblical worldview program. Kevin is the father of 5 children, the Executive Director of Christian Home Educators of Colorado, and committed to seeing that every child is protected from abortion in Colorado.

The Colorado Personhood Amendment marks a departure from traditional, one-sentence personhood amendments, which have been among the shortest ballot initiatives in the United States. The new amendment was written by Gualberto Garcia Jones, legal analyst for Personhood USA and a founding member of Personhood Colorado, and Kristi Brown (nèe Burton), sponsor of the 2008 Personhood amendment.

The language of the new Personhood amendment includes the following definitions:

(a) “PERSON” APPLIES TO EVERY HUMAN BEING REGARDLESS OF THE METHOD OF CREATION.

(b) A “HUMAN BEING” IS A MEMBER OF THE SPECIES HOMO SAPIENS AT ANY STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT.

The new Personhood Amendment language also details effects of the amendment. After the amendment is submitted to the Secretary of State’s office today, the sponsors will wait to receive approval from the Secretary of State before beginning the petition process.

“Personhood USA is headquartered in Denver, and as a Colorado native, I am happy to be supporting another personhood amendment that will protect every child, no matter their age, race, gender, location, or size,” explained Keith Mason, President of Personhood USA. “In past elections Planned Parenthood, which is the largest and wealthiest abortion provider in the United States, attacked our amendments with lies and scare tactics. The new personhood language prevents those falsehoods by making it absolutely clear what the amendment can and cannot do – while still protecting every child from his or her earliest stages.”

Press Conference to Announce Round 3 of Colorado Personhood Initiative for 2012

On Monday, November 21, Personhood Colorado and Personhood USA will release details of their plans for a 2012 Personhood Amendment. New sponsors and new personhood language – the first of its kind in the United States – will be revealed in a press conference on the Capitol Steps.

Following the Mississippi defeat, the leadership of Personhood USA and Personhood Colorado will unveil a new game plan for the Colorado Personhood Amendment.

“This new Personhood Amendment will be unlike any other,” explained Gualberto GarciaJones, legal analyst for Personhood USA and founding member of Personhood Colorado. “Between 2008 and 2010, we saw a tremendous increase – 51,000 additional people voted for life. In 2012, we expect to continue this trend – new language and sponsors will continue to increase the odds in our favor.”

What: Personhood USA and Personhood Colorado announce plans for 2012 personhood initiative.

Where: West Steps of the Denver Capitol

When: Monday, November 21st, at 11:00am.

Personhood USA is a grassroots, Christian organization founded to establish personhood efforts across America to create protections for every child by love and by law. Personhood USA is committed to assisting and supporting personhood legislation and constitutional amendments and building local pro-life organizations through raising awareness of the personhood of the preborn.

Personhood USA’s amendments recognize that every human being is a person, and every person has a right to life. Personhood amendments and bills protect every child, no matter their size or age.

Personhood USA and Yes on 26 to host Election Results and Victory Event

ELECTION NIGHT LOCATION AND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR JACKSON-AREA SUPPORTERS AND INTERESTED PRESS:

Yes on 26 will join with Pro-life Mississippi team members including Personhood USA to have a “wait and pray” event (7:30 pm – 10:00 pm) on election night at the following location:

• AJ’s on the Lake

• 361 Township Avenue

• Ridgeland, Mississippi

• 601-856-2844

www.ajsgrille.com

Personhood USA President Keith Mason and Legal Analyst Gualberto Garcia-Jones will be available for interviews, along with Yes on 26 Board Members Dr. Freda Bush, Ms. Terri Herring, and Bishop Ronnie Crudup.

For further information, please contact Greg Sanders at 662-523-6722.

Personhood USA Applauds Findings of New Report Detailing Legal Effects of Mississippi Personhood Amendment 26

On Yahoo News: http://news.yahoo.com/personhood-usa-applauds-findings-report-detailing-...

Personhood USA says new report confirms “the rights of the preborn, as affirmed by the Mississippi Personhood Amendment, will not take precedence.”

Jackson, MS (PRWEB) November 05, 2011
In a new report titled “Personhood Amendment Will Not Change Legal Safeguards for Physicians Providing Necessary Treatment to Pregnant Patients,” the Mississippi Center for Public Policy analyzes the legal effects of enacting the Mississippi Personhood Amendment, Initiative 26. The analysis can be read at: http://www.mspolicy.com.

“The Mississippi Center for Public Policy has received many questions about the legal implications of Ballot Initiative 26 – The Personhood Amendment. One question that stands out is whether the amendment would subject medical professionals to prosecution for performing life-saving procedures, such as treating a woman for cancer or terminating an ectopic pregnancy,” writes co-author and Policy Analyst George S. Whitten, Jr., Esq.

“Personhood USA is pleased that an independent organization has taken the time to write this assessment and clear up any confusion,” said Personhood USA Legal Analyst Gualberto Garcia Jones, J.D.

As to the claim that Amendment 26 will prohibit life-saving medical care, it reads: “Mississippi law permits abortion in order to save the life of the mother. Our statutes already exempt physicians from being prosecuted for terminating an ectopic pregnancy. Passage of the Personhood Amendment would not change these statutes.”

Whitten writes: “Mississippi law protects medical professionals from criminal liability for the accidental homicide of an unborn person. Under the Personhood Amendment, there will continue to be no criminal liability for medical professionals who prescribe a medication fatal to an unborn baby to treat a female patient whose pregnancy was unknown and was not reasonably discoverable.”

Answering questions regarding in vitro fertilization, he continues: “IVF assists in reproducing a human life. By contrast, abortion necessarily involves killing a human life. IVF procedures can be performed without destroying human embryos, and therefore would still be permissible under Initiative 26. As is currently being done in many cases, any excess embryos not implanted in the womb could be frozen and implanted later or adopted out to other parents.”

“Before birth, we are persons, not property,” continued Garcia Jones. “Amendment 26 simply ends the destruction by recognizing our right to live at this age.”

Co-author and Vice President for Policy Jameson Taylor, Ph.D. concludes: “[I]f an unborn child’s death is accidental or necessary to save his mother’s life, there is no justifiable legal or ethical ground for prosecuting a physician who terminates an ectopic pregnancy or who prescribes medication injurious to an unborn child – either under current law, or under a state constitution that recognizes the basic fact that life begins at fertilization.”

“Despite all of the media attention focusing on unsubstantiated concerns, this third party analysis confirms what supporters of Amendment 26 have been saying all along—the rights of the preborn, as affirmed by the Mississippi Personhood Amendment, will not take precedence over those of the mother,” stated Garcia Jones, J.D. “In fact, as it is written to protect every human being, both born and unborn, it will simply validate the equal and inalienable rights of all people and facilitate a just society.”

###

New Report Details Legal Effects of Amendment 26, Refutes Opponent Allegations

Jackson, MS -- In a new report titled “Personhood Amendment Will Not Change Legal Safeguards for Physicians Providing Necessary Treatment to Pregnant Patients,” the Mississippi Center for Public Policy analyzes the legal effects of enacting the Mississippi Personhood Amendment, Initiative 26. The analysis can be read at: http://www.mspolicy.com.

“The Mississippi Center for Public Policy has received many questions about the legal implications of Ballot Initiative 26 – The Personhood Amendment. One question that stands out is whether the amendment would subject medical professionals to prosecution for performing life-saving procedures, such as treating a woman for cancer or terminating an ectopic pregnancy. This memo provides both a legal and ethical response to this and related questions,” writes co-author and Policy Analyst George S. Whitten, Jr., Esq.

As to the claim that Amendment 26 will prohibit life-saving medical care, it reads:

“Mississippi law permits abortion in order to save the life of the mother. Our statutes already exempt physicians from being prosecuted for terminating an ectopic pregnancy. Passage of the Personhood Amendment would not change these statutes.”

Whitten writes:

“Mississippi law protects medical professionals from criminal liability for the accidental homicide of an unborn person. Under the Personhood Amendment, there will continue to be no criminal liability for medical professionals who prescribe a medication fatal to an unborn baby to treat a female patient whose pregnancy was unknown and was not reasonably discoverable.”

Answering questions regarding in vitro fertilization, he continues:

“IVF assists in reproducing a human life. By contrast, abortion necessarily involves killing a human life. IVF procedures can be performed without destroying human embryos, and therefore would still be permissible under Initiative 26. As is currently being done in many cases, any excess embryos not implanted in the womb could be frozen and implanted later or adopted out to other parents.”

Co-author and Vice President for Policy Jameson Taylor, Ph.D. concludes:

“[I]f an unborn child’s death is accidental or necessary to save his mother’s life, there is no justifiable legal or ethical ground for prosecuting a physician who terminates an ectopic pregnancy or who prescribes medication injurious to an unborn child – either under current law, or under a state constitution that recognizes the basic fact that life begins at fertilization.”

“Despite all of the media attention focusing on unsubstantiated concerns, this third party analysis confirms what supporters of Amendment 26 have been saying all along—the rights of the preborn, as affirmed by the Mississippi Personhood Amendment, will not take precedence over those of the mother,” said Personhood USA Legal Analyst Gualberto Garcia Jones, J.D. “In fact, as it is written to protect every human being, both born and unborn, it will simply validate the equal and inalienable rights of all people and facilitate a just society.”

Syndicate content